Daktylus und Enhoplios in Damons Rhythmuslehre

TitleDaktylus und Enhoplios in Damons Rhythmuslehre
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2016
AuthorsAlmazova, N
Ancient AuthorsDamon Mus. (TLG 2232), Aristophanes Comic. (TLG 0019), Plato Phil. (TLG 0059), Athenaeus Soph. (TLG 0008)
JournalHyperboreus
Volume22
Issue1
Pagination94–126
Abstract

In an obscure passage of Plato (Resp. 3. 400 a–c) Socrates refers to Damon’s rhythmic theory and mentions a “compound enoplian” and a “dactylic and heroic” rhythms. The same Damonian doctrine is probably implied in Aristophanes’ verse (Nub. 648–651), where the rhythms kat’ enhoplion and kata daktylon are opposed. It follows from the context of Aristophanes that Damon’s studies were generally known, and that the named types of rhythms were similar, but at the same time well distinguishable according to a certain criterion. One can assume that rhythms consisting of pure dactylic feet belonged to the category kata daktylon, but it is disputable if spondees, acephalic and catalectic dactyls and dactyloepitrites were also included. On the other hand, it was argued that precisely the dactylo-epitrite cola – namely enoplian, prosodiac, hemiepes, and reizian – formed the kat’ enhoplion category. A clear criterion, which Damon could have used to oppose these two species of rhythms, was proposed by K. J. Dover: he conjectured that ka